Safety for People who use AAC                                                  


Site Map  |  Path:  ACCPC / Safety / Toronto Project Implementation


Project Implementation
 

Toronto Project Implementation


Project Description   top of page

Reducing the Risk aimed to explore the safety needs of adults who use AAC and who live in the community. The project undertook the following tasks:

  • Development of a team with expertise in AAC, disability and self defense.
  • Development of a survey to explore the safety needs of AAC users.
  • Research and compilation of tools and strategies to support AAC users in reducing their risk of abuse.
  • Development and implementation of a 12-week curriculum for AAC users.
  • Evaluation of outcomes.

About the Participants   top of page

Reducing the Risk provided the following services for 8 adults who use AAC in the Toronto area. All participants had previously attended educational sessions through the Speak Up Project and all had requested more input on ways to reduce their risk of abuse.

Participant Profile:

  • 4 females and 4 males who use AAC.
  • The participants’ ages ranged from 30 to 64.
  • Seven participants had voice output communication aids. However, the majority of the participants chose to use their communication displays over their devices.
  • The majority of participants had reduced literacy skills.
  • All participants used scanning methods to access their displays and/or communication devices.
  • Six participants were independently mobile in power wheel chairs, although only one had quick and easy access to driving his wheelchair.
  • Most of the participants lived in group homes, and single or shared apartments with on-site attendant services.
  • All of the participants relied on attendant services.
  • The majority of the participants did not have telephone access.

Safety Needs of Participants   top of page

The survey revealed a need to address the personal safety of people who use AAC primarily within three areas:

  • Communicating about rights and safeguarding within the attendant/care giving context.

  • Communicating in emergency situations.

  • Managing money and personal property.

The survey revealed that while most of the individuals have a means of gaining attention, their ability to communicate the nature of their need and the assistance that is required is severely limited.

Knowledge and competence in handling a variety of safety issues at home and in the community varied among the participants. However, there was a strong desire among the participants to be empowered and as independent as possible when it comes to handling money, as well as knowing what to do if made to feel afraid, uneasy, threatened, punished, and being safe in the community and at night.


Training Course   top of page

Reducing the Risk provided a 12-week course (24 hours) on safety for AAC users.

Content

The course focused on the following topics:

  • Carrying valuables in the community
  • Purchasing items in the community/via an attendant
  • Personal boundaries and privacy
  • Keeping things safe and private
  • Communicating in emergencies

Although identified as key areas of need, it was outside the scope of this project to comprehensively address issues relating to interpersonal relationships, conflict resolution and negotiation skills.

Note: All participants had attended extensive educational sessions on sexual abuse and safeguarding through the Speak Up Project, therefore sexual victimization was not targeted during this project. Safeguarding against sexual abuse should be considered for other educational projects aimed at reducing the risk of abuse for AAC users.


Group Context

The following components were key factors in facilitating the group learning context:

  • Clear guidelines for participating in the group

    For example: confidentiality about what is heard in the group; what should and should not be shared in group-setting, procedures for ensuring safety in the groups etc.


  • Guidelines for communicating in the group

    For example: respecting options; giving time for communication etc.


  • At least 1 communication facilitator/interpreter for 2 AAC users. In some cases, one on one support.


  • Attendant services on-site.

Individual Support

  • Participants were asked to invite a facilitator (e.g. family member, friend or attendant of their choice).
  • Participants who did not have a facilitator and who wanted one, were supported in finding someone who could assist them in following up with any action plans relating to the course.
  • Time for individual consultation was ensured prior to or after the sessions.
  • Majority of participants were given support from their literacy teacher in working on their goals from the course.

Peer Support

  • Emphasis was placed on peer learning via facilitated small group discussions.
  • AAC user was hired as consultant to project provided feedback and input on all aspects of the training program.
  • Seven people with disabilities and who speak acted as advisors to the project.

Format

  • Each session focused on a goal and presented scenarios to elicit and discuss tools and strategies. Tools and strategies were then compiled and provided in a later session.
  • All participants obtained a binder and were supported in customizing each instructional unit for themselves.

Evaluation

  • Individual interviews after the course.
 
 

   top of page   


© Copyright, ACCPC 2007, All Rights Reserved